you mean this bug, yes? Bug 149818 - Refactoring functionalities https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=149818
Unfortunately most of the PDT team works also on commercial Zend Studio, which already has refactorings. So while we'd love to put refactorings in PDT, this would harm our employer property :-( Therefore I see two options: either someone else contributes his implementation of refactorings, or community needs to push Zend to free the refactorings. In the first case, that generous someone would be definitely welcomed as a committer in PDT team. ________________________________________ From: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] on behalf of Sjaak Eenhuis [excepti...@hotmail.com] Sent: 19 January 2011 14:04 To: pdt-dev Subject: Re: [pdt-dev] pdt roadmap hi Jacek > as far as I know, the team is focusing on stability, performance and > usability of PDT - picking the bugzilla bugs appropriately. > Are there any particular issues you believe deserve more effort? Well that sounds reasonable. The only nasty issue that I experience from time to time is the error "Zero or negative length StyleRange", but that has already been noticed (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=331220). 2.2 is by far the best release of pdt. I am quite happy :) Personally I think pdt would benefit from adding refactoring functionality. I looked at the LTK-toolkit, I guess we could use this? I am not a pdt developer so forgive my ignorance but is it possible to access PDT's language model from within LTK's extension points? I think this would be needed if you are about to change a class name and you want to update the file {name, location} automatically. > I'm sorry about the e-mails about outdated plans. It's unfortunate :-( > > ________________________________________ > From: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] on behalf of > Sjaak Eenhuis [excepti...@hotmail.com] > Sent: 18 January 2011 21:33 > To: pdt-dev > Subject: [pdt-dev] pdt roadmap > > Hi everyone, > > I would like to ask if there is a roadmap for pdt. If I am not mistaken, from > time to time we get a message on this list that the project plan is outdated > or missing. > At least http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=tools.pdt > hasn't changed for a long time :D > > Do we have any special plans for the next pdt version? > _______________________________________________ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev _______________________________________________ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
