> you mean this bug, yes? > > Bug 149818 - Refactoring functionalities > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=149818
Yeah that's right. > Unfortunately most of the PDT team works also on commercial Zend Studio, > which already has refactorings. So while we'd love to put refactorings in > PDT, this would harm our employer property :-( > Therefore I see two options: either someone else contributes his > implementation of refactorings, or community needs to push Zend to free the > refactorings. > In the first case, that generous someone would be definitely welcomed as a > committer in PDT team. Thanks for your honest answer. I understand that Zend Studio needs to provide more value than pdt in order to remain profitable. I think we cannot ask Zend to put its refactoring implementation in the public domain. But I am happy you won't refuse such a community contribution. > ________________________________________ > From: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] on behalf of > Sjaak Eenhuis [excepti...@hotmail.com] > Sent: 19 January 2011 14:04 > To: pdt-dev > Subject: Re: [pdt-dev] pdt roadmap > > hi Jacek > > > as far as I know, the team is focusing on stability, performance and > > usability of PDT - picking the bugzilla bugs appropriately. > > Are there any particular issues you believe deserve more effort? > > Well that sounds reasonable. The only nasty issue that I experience from time > to time is the error "Zero or negative length StyleRange", but that has > already been noticed (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=331220). > 2.2 is by far the best release of pdt. I am quite happy :) > > Personally I think pdt would benefit from adding refactoring functionality. I > looked at the LTK-toolkit, I guess we could use this? I am not a pdt > developer so forgive my ignorance but is it possible to access PDT's language > model from within LTK's extension points? > I think this would be needed if you are about to change a class name and you > want to update the file {name, location} automatically. > > > > I'm sorry about the e-mails about outdated plans. It's unfortunate :-( > > > > ________________________________________ > > From: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] on behalf > > of Sjaak Eenhuis [excepti...@hotmail.com] > > Sent: 18 January 2011 21:33 > > To: pdt-dev > > Subject: [pdt-dev] pdt roadmap > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I would like to ask if there is a roadmap for pdt. If I am not mistaken, > > from time to time we get a message on this list that the project plan is > > outdated or missing. > > At least > > http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=tools.pdt hasn't > > changed for a long time :D > > > > Do we have any special plans for the next pdt version? > > > > > _______________________________________________ > pdt-dev mailing list > pdt-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev > _______________________________________________ > pdt-dev mailing list > pdt-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev _______________________________________________ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
