Info about subscribing or unsubscribing from this list is at the bottom of this 
message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0221-23.htm
Violence Trumps Rebuilding in Iraq: U.S. officials say soaring security
costs have consumed $1 billion earmarked for badly needed water, power and
sanitation projects

---------------

http://snipurl.com/do2h

Army Having Difficulty Meeting Goals In Recruiting
Fewer Enlistees Are in Pipeline; Many Being Rushed Into Service

By Ann Scott Tyson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, February 21, 2005; Page A01

The active-duty Army is in danger of failing to meet its recruiting goals,
and is beginning to suffer from manpower strains like those that have
dropped the National Guard and Reserves below full strength, according to
Army figures and interviews with senior officers .

For the first time since 2001, the Army began the fiscal year in October
with only 18.4 percent of the year's target of 80,000 active-duty recruits
already in the pipeline. That amounts to less than half of last year's
figure and falls well below the Army's goal of 25 percent.

Meanwhile, the Army is rushing incoming recruits into training as quickly
as it can. Compared with last year, it has cut by 50 percent the average
number of days between the time a recruit signs up and enters boot camp.
It is adding more than 800 active-duty recruiters to the 5,201 who were on
the job last year, as attracting each enlistee requires more effort and
monetary incentives.

Driving the manpower crunch is the Army's goal of boosting the number of
combat brigades needed to rotate into Iraq and handle other global
contingencies. Yet Army officials see worrisome signs that young American
men and women -- and their parents -- are growing wary of military
service, largely because of the Iraq conflict.

"Very frankly, in a couple of places our recruiting pool is getting soft,"
said Lt. Gen. Franklin L. Hagenbeck, the Army's personnel chief. "We're
hearing things like, 'Well, let's wait and see how this thing settles out
in Iraq,' " he said in an interview. "For the active duty for '05 it's
going to be tough to meet our goal, but I think we can. I think the
telling year for us is going to be '06."

Other senior military officers have voiced similar concerns in recent
days. "I anticipate that fiscal year '05 will be very challenging for both
active and reserve component recruiting," Gen. Richard B. Myers, chairman
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told a House Appropriations subcommittee
Feb. 17. The Marine Corps fell short of its monthly recruiting quota in
January for the first time in nearly a decade.

Because the Army is the main U.S. military ground force, its ability to
draw recruits is critical to the nation's preparedness to fight current
and future wars. The Army can sustain its ranks through retaining more
experienced soldiers -- and indeed retention in 2004 was 107 percent --
but if too few young recruits sign up, the force will begin to age.
Moreover, higher retention in the active-duty Army translates into a
dwindling stream of recruits for the already troubled Army Guard and
Reserve.

Army officials say the challenge is not yet a crisis. As of Jan. 31, the
Army tallied 22,246 active-duty recruits for fiscal 2005, exceeding the
year-to-date mission by more than 100.

Still, the recruiting difficulties reflect unprecedented demands on
today's soldiers that are unlikely to let up soon. Never before has the
all-volunteer Army deployed to war zones in such large numbers for
multiple, yearlong tours. It is doing so with a total force cut by 300,000
troops -- from 28 active-duty and reserve divisions to 18 -- since the
1991 Persian Gulf War.

The Army is now working to add 30,000 soldiers by 2009, expanding the
active-duty force from 482,000 to 512,000, as it builds 10 to 15 new
combat brigades to add to divisions for overseas tours. But cultivating so
many fresh recruits without lowering standards is a serious challenge,
senior Army leaders say. "If you cut down 300,000 trees, you can do that
pretty quick, but now grow 30,000 of them back," Gen. Peter Schoomaker,
Army chief of staff, told a House Armed Services committee hearing Feb. 9.
"It takes time, as you know, to grow the quality soldier."

Time, however, is what the Army lacks.

Beyond replacing normal turnover each year, officials say the Army must
accelerate recruitment to meet an aggressive timeline for filling out the
new brigades of 3,500 to 4,000 soldiers each, as well as to expand and
reorganize the 33 existing brigades.

Newly trained troops are essentially being rationed out -- a process Army
officers call "turning on the faucet" -- a few months before the brigades
are to deploy to Iraq, Afghanistan or elsewhere. The military plans to
keep about 120,000 troops in Iraq through 2006.

"The priority fill goes to deploying units to make sure they are at full
strength before they go overseas," says Col. Joseph Anderson, who until
this month served as chief of staff of the 101st Airborne Division at Fort
Campbell, Ky.

Such demands have led the Army to deplete its reservoir of enlistees in
the Delayed Entry Program (DEP). The DEP consists of people who have
signed enlistment contracts but opt to delay their entry to training camps
for up to a year. DEP numbers fell from 33,249 at the beginning of fiscal
2004 to 14,739 at the start of this fiscal year, according to U.S. Army
Recruiting Command statistics.

As a result, while the Army began last year with 45.9 percent of its
recruiting goal filled by the pool, this year it started with just 18.4
percent in the pool -- the lowest amount since 2001 and well below the 30
percent average for the past decade. That means the Army must redouble its
efforts to meet this year's target.

"Would we like a deeper DEP, a greater number? Of course we would,"
Hagenbeck said. But despite his anticipation of an even tougher recruiting
environment in 2006 -- resulting from an improving economy and public
uncertainty over the Iraq war -- he said the overriding need to hasten
recruits to units means there are no plans to replenish the DEP this year.

Meanwhile, netting each new recruit is proving more difficult and
time-consuming, Hagenbeck said, requiring the Army to put hundreds more
active-duty recruiters on the job.

"The youngsters that are joining us are spending more time with the
recruiters before they raise their right hand," he said. Today, most
prospective enlistees contact the Army via the Internet, he said, asking
numerous questions that require more recruiters to answer online and
follow up with phone calls.

But few candidates will join up before meeting a recruiter in person and
spending significant amounts of time with one, he said. "They ultimately
want to see a soldier, a recruiter, and talk to them eyeball to eyeball,"
he said. As a result, "the recruiter who could go out and recruit two
people this week might be consumed with recruiting that one."

The average cost of signing up a recruit is also beginning to rise, from
$15,265 in fiscal 2001 to $15,967 in fiscal 2004 -- the result of more
recruiters, advertising, and increased enlistment bonuses. In January, the
Army announced a new six-month advertising contract with Leo Burnett USA
worth an estimated $100 million. The Army is offering bonuses of as much
as $20,000 to enlist on active duty for four years, with special monetary
incentives for candidates who have college degrees, sign up for
high-priority jobs or agree to move quickly into training.

The Army is also paying more to retain active-duty soldiers, 50 percent of
whom now receive reenlistment bonuses, compared with 39 percent in 2003,
Army officials said.

"We may not get exactly the number of people we want, but we're not
sacrificing quality," Army Secretary Francis J. Harvey told a House
committee Feb. 9.

The Army is offering higher ranks to enlistees who have spent time in
college or junior ROTC, and as a result is bringing in more recruits at
ranks above private, or E-1.

Such policies could partly explain a shift in the Army's junior enlisted
ranks that has perplexed military analysts. The number of privates (E-1
through E-3) in the active-duty Army has sharply declined from 126,100 in
October 2001 to 107,500 in December 2004. Meanwhile, the number of
corporals and specialists (E-4) has risen from 95,400 to 115,500.

Another explanation is that the active-duty Army is maintaining its force
strength more through retention than recruitment, resulting in a subtle
aging of the force -- a trend already evident in the Army Reserve,
officials said.

_____________________________

Note: This message comes from the peace-justice-news e-mail mailing list of 
articles and commentaries about peace and social justice issues, activism, etc. 
 If you do not regularly receive mailings from this list or have received this 
message as a forward from someone else and would like to be added to the list, 
send a blank e-mail with the subject "subscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
or you can visit:
http://lists.enabled.com/mailman/listinfo/peace-justice-news  Go to that same 
web address to view the list's archives or to unsubscribe.

E-mail accounts that become full, inactive or out of order for more than a few 
days will be deleted from this list.

FAIR USE NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the 
information in this e-mail is distributed without profit to those who have 
expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational 
purposes.  I am making such material available in an effort to advance 
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, 
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair 
use' of copyrighted material as provided for in the US Copyright Law.

Reply via email to