Info about subscribing or unsubscribing from this list is at the bottom of this 
message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2497

The New Pope and Journalism�s Crisis of Faith

Media Beat (4/21/05)
By Norman Solomon

The papacy of Benedict XVI confronts journalists with a key question: How
much critical scrutiny is appropriate when a religious leader gains
enormous power?

So far, most American media outlets seem to be walking on eggshells to
avoid tough coverage of the new pope. Caution is in the air, and some of
it is valid. Anti-Catholic bigotry has a long and ugly history in the
United States. News organizations should stay away from disparaging the
Catholic faith, which certainly deserves as much respect as any other
religion.

At the same time, the Vatican is a massive global power. Though it has no
army, it is more powerful than many governments. And in the present day,
the headquarters of the Roman Catholic Church is the capital of political
reaction garbed in religiosity. Many dividing lines between theology and
ideology have virtually disappeared.

After more than two decades as a Vatican power broker, Joseph Ratzinger is
now in charge as Pope Benedict XVI. He is extremely well-positioned to
push a longstanding agenda that includes hostility toward AIDS prevention
measures, women�s rights, gay rights and movements for social justice. No
one in the hierarchy was more committed to stances like vehement
opposition to condoms while millions of people contracted cases of AIDS
that could have been prevented. And he has been the commander of the
Vatican�s war on liberation theology.

During the 1980s, it was Ratzinger who led the charge from Rome against
the wondrous spirit and vibrant activism that galvanized Catholics and
others across Latin America. While many priests, nuns and laity bravely
joined together to challenge U.S.-backed regimes inflicting economic
exploitation, intimidation, torture and murder with impunity, Ratzinger
used the Vatican�s authority to undermine such community-based resistance.
He silenced outspoken Church officials and installed orthodox clergy who
would go along with the deadly status quo.

Hours after the smoke cleared over the Vatican and the world learned the
name of the new pope, Mary Jo McConahay -- an insightful journalist who
has long covered Latin America -- wrote for Pacific News Service about a
question blowing in the wind. �What would have happened, Guatemalans and
El Salvadorans ask to this day, if Ratzinger and Pope John Paul II had
regarded the Latin American call for liberation from autocratic rulers
with the same force with which the European churchmen supported the Polish
Solidarity revolution?�

For right-wing religious activists, Ratzinger has been a Godsend. And now
that he�s running a church with 1.l billion members, the odds are
excellent that he will proceed to gladden the hearts of misogynists,
homophobes, and anti-left crusaders around the world. Contrary to the
predictable media spin since Tuesday about the uncertainty of his papal
course (reminiscent of the claims in early 2001 that George W. Bush might
turn out to be some kind of moderate president), everything we know about
Ratzinger�s extensive record during the last quarter-century tells us that
he is a reactionary zealot who is determined to shove much of the world�s
history of progressive social change into reverse. He is a true believer
whose ideological theology accepts scant diversity and no dissent.

The new papacy is a huge gift to the minority of conservatives in the
United States who are trying to impose their version of morality on the
country and the world.

Soon after the 2000 election, an astute analyst of far-right religious
movements, Frederick Clarkson, wrote that �both the evangelical and
Catholic Right are developing and promoting a long-term, fundamental
approach to the practice of faith that links political involvement with
faith itself. In this case, the Catholic Church is building on its own
history and also benefiting from the Christian Right's recent efforts to
create wider space for public expressions of religiosity in civil
discourse.� Clarkson added that �a shift in the political culture suggests
that personal and unedited expressions of religious belief for political
purposes are no longer considered unseemly. Indeed, the suggestion is that
they are beyond reproach.�

And that�s much of the problem. When a highly debatable position is
�beyond reproach� -- when religiosity provides cover for all manner of
manipulations and repression -- it�s easier for demagogic power-mongers to
get away with murder.

Journalists should not let any pious proclamations intimidate them. When
the policies of a president or prime minister result in suppression of
human rights or fuel public-health disasters, the news media should not
hesitate to expose the consequences. And the policies of a pope should be
no less scrutinized.

_____________________________

Note: This message comes from the peace-justice-news e-mail mailing list of 
articles and commentaries about peace and social justice issues, activism, etc. 
 If you do not regularly receive mailings from this list or have received this 
message as a forward from someone else and would like to be added to the list, 
send a blank e-mail with the subject "subscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
or you can visit:
http://lists.enabled.com/mailman/listinfo/peace-justice-news  Go to that same 
web address to view the list's archives or to unsubscribe.

E-mail accounts that become full, inactive or out of order for more than a few 
days will be deleted from this list.

FAIR USE NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the 
information in this e-mail is distributed without profit to those who have 
expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational 
purposes.  I am making such material available in an effort to advance 
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, 
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair 
use' of copyrighted material as provided for in the US Copyright Law.

Reply via email to