Info about subscribing or unsubscribing from this list is at the bottom of this 
message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://snipurl.com/enew

In the Name of Sibel Edmonds: Intelligence whistleblowers storm Capitol
Hill, asking for the right to be heard.

by James Ridgeway
April 29th, 2005
Village Voice

WASHINGTON, D.C.�Galvanized by the case of FBI whistleblower Sibel
Edmonds, intelligence agents representing more than 50 current and former
federal employees�calling themselves the National Security Whistleblowers
Coalition�stormed Capitol Hill yesterday to demand Congressional
protection from retaliation by their dead beat bosses in the intelligence
bureaucracy.
Many of these whistleblowers have tried to get someone to listen to what
they know about national security issues, from cover-ups to possible
espionage. More often than not, they say, their protests result in
vicious, demeaning, ruinous retaliation by the bosses. In any number of
cases, they're put under gag orders.

Edmonds, a translator hired to bolster the FBI's weak languages staff
after 9-11, says she was forced to go public with accusations that the
work she was observing was not just flawed but was actually dangerous to
national security. The government responded by firing her and classifying
all of her attempts to speak out, including an interview with 60 Minutes.
She is suing the feds for violation of First Amendment rights. A judge
this month moved to close the hearings, over the objections of national
media.

The list of her supporters yesterday ran the gamut of the federal
intelligence community, including more than half a dozen FBI agents along
with federal employees from the National Security Agency, Customs,
Homeland Security, Army intelligence, Navy intelligence, Defense
Intelligence, Department of Energy, the FAA, and the CIA.

The theme was the same throughout: How to stop their supervisors from
retaliating against them for protesting wrongdoing within their agencies.
One NSA agent told how when he raised questions about a fellow worker,
saying he'd spotted the telltale signs of possible espionage, he was
ignored, then sent for an emergency psychological examination and stripped
of his security clearance because he was found to be crazy.

Demoted from his job as an analyst, he was dispatched to the motor pool
and made to drive the higher-ups around. Coleen Rowley, the FBI agent who
blew the whistle on the bureau�s handling of warnings before 9-11. John
Vincent, a retired longtime FBI counterterrorism agent from Chicago who
currently works for Judicial Watch, came to speak for�not himself but for
fellow agent Robert Wright, who is under a gag order. A former U.S.
marshal told how his supervisors retaliated against his protests and �left
me on a stakeout to die.�

No one in the intelligence community has whistleblower protection of any
kind. Most observers would think it sheer madness for these people to
speak out. According to a new study by the Project on Government
Oversight, what happens is a slow stigmatizing of the whistleblower. It
begins with marginalizing the employee by taking away his or her job.
Next, the security clearanced it taken away, effectively firing him. A lie
detector test is given. If the whistleblower persists, he or she is
subjected to a retaliatory investigation.

The employee�s mental health is questioned. In certain instances, agencies
actually try to entrap the employee. For example, Sibel Edmonds tells the
story of how she was accused by her FBI superiors of carrying classified
materials to Congress. How did the bureau know that?

Easy, said the investigating supervisor. Agents had been dispatched to
tail her (she at that point was just a bothersome woman), and they heard
her discussing the contents of the classified documents over lunch with
her visiting sister and mother. However, Edmonds is Turkish-American and
her mother and sister are Turkish citizens. They were talking in Turkish.
The agents didn�t speak Turkish.

The coalition wants federal legislation protecting their right to speak
out and granting the right to sue for damages to themselves and their
careers in federal court.

_____________________________

Note: This message comes from the peace-justice-news e-mail mailing list of 
articles and commentaries about peace and social justice issues, activism, etc. 
 If you do not regularly receive mailings from this list or have received this 
message as a forward from someone else and would like to be added to the list, 
send a blank e-mail with the subject "subscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
or you can visit:
http://lists.enabled.com/mailman/listinfo/peace-justice-news  Go to that same 
web address to view the list's archives or to unsubscribe.

E-mail accounts that become full, inactive or out of order for more than a few 
days will be deleted from this list.

FAIR USE NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the 
information in this e-mail is distributed without profit to those who have 
expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational 
purposes.  I am making such material available in an effort to advance 
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, 
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair 
use' of copyrighted material as provided for in the US Copyright Law.

Reply via email to