On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 22:46 +0100, Jakub Zelenka wrote: > I was thinking about fann2 and it probably doesn't make sense. It's a very > specialized extension and I really don't think that the reusing of name > could break anything. It would be probably a bit confusing for users. Also > Evan has already confirmed that he agrees with the reusing of name.
Alright, I just wanted to have it discussed. > I have requested a PECL account (bukka). If there are no objections, please > could you approve the account request and give me a karma for maintaining > the fann extension and committing its documentaion? I'll try to get to it over the weekend, if somebody else is faster I don't mind. I wonder whether we want to get a copy of the old extension into git as historic backup as when reusing the pecl package site we'll remove the traces to the external repo ... johannes -- PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
