On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 17:30 +0400, Dmitry Koterov wrote: > So am I right that there is no chance to make more-or-less standard "make > test" work in this case? I suppose that "make test" is a standard step that > is performed by a typical user of a PECL extension... People will be > confused if plain "make test" does not work.
It is not fully reliable. Unfortunately. run-test mostly assumes that people use static extensions, as that's what most core developers do. The whole module dependency story is a bit weak ... but a very complex subject nobody invested time in recently. Completely switching topics: I see you only requested an PECL account, not an VCS account. Benefit of the VCS account would be that you could put the master repository on git.php.net (which is mirrored to github.com/php/). Then other PHP developers could push there (in the past there had i.e. been one or two cases where we pushed API changesto all extensions). Downside is that you loose some control and pull requests on github won't work as nicely. Putting the repo on git.php.net is preferred but no requirement. If you want to use git.php.net please fill out http://php.net/git-php.php else confirm you only need a PECL account and I'll set it up. johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
