On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Hannes Magnusson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Anatol Belski <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, June 11, 2014 00:06, Hannes Magnusson wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Anatol Belski <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, June 9, 2014 19:09, Hannes Magnusson wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Hannes Magnusson >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Anatol Belski <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, June 3, 2014 19:14, Hannes Magnusson wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I noticed you pushed bunch of changes to the repo just which >>>>>>>> seem to actually have been live for a while.. Does the build >>>>>>>> host update from some other repo I would need to merge up to? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> that's the github OSTC repo forked from rmtools somewhen, havent >>>>>>> synced for a while. As that system is a prerunner for what we >>>>>>> gonna have with the travis integration, it doesn't really matter. >>>>>>> As besides >>>>>>> the snapshot builds running tests is also the topic, which is much >>>>>>> finer done with travis. Probably also a good thing to deliberate >>>>>>> before starting to do something. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I think we just did that and have a solid plan I can work on. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Since attempting to duplicate the machinery is clearly impossible >>>>>> task without having access to the current setup I would need to work >>>>>> blind folded with trial and error here and there - which is why I >>>>>> asked can I somehow see any logs (and to confirm, it is running the >>>>>> rmtools repo on git.php.net you pointed me too, right?). >>>>>> Alternatively, if I can get >>>>>> access to the infrastructure that would be best. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Any updates? >>>>> Feel like I am slacklining in a pitch dark cave above a lake full of >>>>> piranha :) If this is maintained on a vm or something I can replicate >>>>> it would be awesomest... >>>>> >>>> yes, that's a VM but a clone is out of a question as there are too much >>>> things there we can't simply "revert" to anonymize it. Btw. i really >>>> think travis-ci integration were interesting to keep in mind, as that >>>> would probably turn the whole thing upside down. >>>> >>> >>> >>> Can I get access to the server then while I attempt to develop these >>> patches? >>> >> actually that is out of my competention, but i guess it's the same as with >> the vm clone. I'm going OOF for the next three weeks, and probably offline >> for some time due to the Internet provider update, so will probably be >> able to continue to talk about this topic after that first. >> > > > Who else has access to it I would be able to talk to? > > It doesn't look like there is much of anything I can actually work on > since the infrastructure itself is uncloneable and inaccessible? >
ping? -Hannes -- PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
