> -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Wiseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 19 November 2004 15:10 > To: Protel EDA Discussion List > Subject: Re: [PEDA] 99se vs. DXP vs. 2004.. > > 19/11/2004 13:08:02, "John A. Ross [Design]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >I would like to learn, I have tried to learn, I can hammer at the > QL for > >days, you would not believe the amount of time I invested in > trying to > >get the skills needed to master the QL, at one point I spent a > whole > >week at it, nothing else > > It's possible > you're fighting against something irrelevant, or at least ignorable.
Steve Looking at it that way, you may have a point. But considering the amount of packages I have and do use quite productively (I am not just a Protel user BTW) then if I have a mental block to DXP2004 I guess no-one can help me with that. My initial theory was to get the use of the QL nailed, it nearly became a mission for me, DXP2004 does depend on it so I see it as a necessary skill to drive it optimally, simple truth, is that I failed to make the grade. Perhaps I am now so hell bent on getting the QL into my head that simpler solutions without QL become obtuse, you never know. John ____________________________________________________________ You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum To Post messages: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe and Other Options: http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004): http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current): http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
