My first professional program was a 1500 line macro for Lotus v2.1,
(~1986) used to tabulate data from a velocimeter acquisition system. My
second was another Lotus macro that was an iterative calculator...

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bob stephens
>Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 12:04 PM
>To: 'Protel EDA Discussion List'
>Subject: RE: [PEDA] 99se vs. DXP vs. 2004.. Need a 
>sampleoffeelingsaboutdiff.and reasons for moving or not to the next
>
>I agree with the spreadsheet analogy, it is more like a macro 
>language than a programming language. However I don't find the 
>query language all that intuitive either, and I *AM* a programmer.
>
>I find myself using it only when I can't accomplish something 
>any other way and as a result I pretty well suck at it.
>
>If Altium wasn't Altium and included some clearly worked 
>examples in the manual, I think people would adapt much more readily.
>
>
>Bob Stephens
>Principal Design Engineer
>DCX-CHOL
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Morgan
>Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 8:32 AM
>To: Protel EDA Discussion List
>Subject: RE: [PEDA] 99se vs. DXP vs. 2004.. Need a sample 
>offeelingsaboutdiff.and reasons for moving or not to the next
>
>I would not describe the query language as programming, more 
>like entering a formula in Excel.
>
>When programming you have to worry about each lines affect on 
>all others, the query language is much simpler thatn a 
>'proper' programming language. In the query language, you are 
>just describing what you want to show, all in one line.
>
>How is that any different to clicking the right boxes and 
>typing the a=b formulas for replacement in 'old protel'
>
>I think perhaps calling it a 'language' is what people are 
>worried about - perhaps altium should rename it.
>
>In any case, just like in excel, there is a wizard that allows 
>basic queryies to be build with no knowlege of programming 
>required - just english.
>
>j.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John A. Ross [RSDTV]
>Sent: 19 November 2004 10:48
>To: 'Protel EDA Discussion List'
>Subject: RE: [PEDA] 99se vs. DXP vs. 2004.. Need a sample 
>offeelingsaboutdiff. and reasons for moving or not to the next
>
>
>> snip <
>
>> If your only hurdle to P2004 is the query language, then I 
>suggest you 
>> just get used to it.
>
>Jason
>
>Exactly the attitude Altium took.
>
>There are genuine people out here who cannot get there heads 
>round the query language enough to make it natural for them, 
>if it cannot become a natural trained response then it becomes 
>counter productive.
>
>For anyone who has not been used to working with code at any 
>time it will always be so. 
>
>Trying to force the customer to change to fit the tools / 
>vendors is actually, to be frank, nuts.
>Look at the time it has been around and it still scares people 
>who look at it. 
>
>If this one KEY tool in using P2004 cannot become natural and 
>easy to use then it is a feature that fails the whole tool 
>chain and any other benefits which rely on it (pretty much everything).
>
>I include myself in this group, every day I use DXP and have 
>to do something that was a natural, trained, instinctive 
>process in 99SE and have to make up a query for it I need to 
>think hard about this, construct it, test it, check it and if 
>need be debug it and do it again (very common iterative process). 
>
>I do not have to write a macro in MS word to do a simple thing 
>like select text, and make only that text bold, I have buttons 
>to do it, a graphical process, much easier for the eye/mind to 
>recognise and process. No text to type, no parenthesis to 
>worry about, no syntax to worry about....  
>
>Getting the right query is sometimes the type of iterative 
>process I would expect in software development, or VHDL 
>development where the expected behaviour is to construct, 
>test, debug and back round again.
>
>This however should NOT put anyone off DXP, when it comes to 
>the query language and getting used to it and making it 
>natural to use, well, I must just be extremely stupid and dumb 
>compared to the other 99.9999% of DXP.
>
>It does have its benefits, in odd occasions and it is a 
>feature I would NOT like to see disappear from DXP and be 
>entirely replaced by 99SE method & 99SE query manager, but I 
>can account, in terms of real time, how much pain using the 
>query language directly, instead of a wrapper, costs me.
>
>This is only one mans opinion, mine, I guess, it is also not a 
>direct attack on your post, it . 
>
>John
>
>
> 
>____________________________________________________________
>You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum
>
>To Post messages:
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Unsubscribe and Other Options:
>http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com
>
>Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
> 
>Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>
>
> 
>____________________________________________________________
>You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum
>
>To Post messages:
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Unsubscribe and Other Options:
>http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com
>
>Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
> 
>Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>
>
> 
>____________________________________________________________
>You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum
>
>To Post messages:
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Unsubscribe and Other Options:
>http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com
>
>Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
> 
>Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>
>


____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to