Your links got broken into two lines. Try these: http://makeashorterlink.com/?Q18123BD9
http://makeashorterlink.com/?Z5C123BD9 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Enslen Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 10:35 AM To: 'Protel EDA Discussion List' Subject: RE: [PEDA] interpreting packages Hello All, I've found the Kemet website helpful. I've included a link to an app. Note on their site for Surface Mount Capacitor - Mounting Pad Dimensions and Considerations. http://www.kemet.com/kemet/web/homepage/kechome.nsf/vapubfilesname/f2100 e.pdf/$file/f2100e.pdf Also, I have a link here to another document on their website which shows both the metric and imperial dimensions for their full line of surface mount capacitors (Tantalum and Ceramic). If you look through it, you'll find some good info. http://www.kemet.com/kemet/web/homepage/kechome.nsf/vapubfilesname/F3102 .pdf/$file/F3102.PDF Dan Enslen The only reason time exists is so everything doesn't happen all at once. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paresh Pai Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 9:39 AM To: Protel EDA Discussion List Subject: Re: [PEDA] interpreting packages Thank you all indeed for the information. Paresh Pai. Goa India ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 4:43 PM Subject: Re: [PEDA] interpreting packages > In a message dated 2004-11-20 06:05:42 AM Eastern Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > Can anybody tell me how to interpret package codes for smd components eg. > > 1506,2010,1805 , 6032 and 7227 > > > > Usually those are physical dimensions of resistors, capacitors, etc. There's > one series of numbers using imperial dimensions (inches): > > 0201 - 0.02 x 0.01 > 0402 - 0.04 x 0.02 > 0603 - 0.06 x 0.03 > 0805 - 0.08 x 0.05 > 1206 - 0.12 x 0.06 > 1812 - 0.18 x 0.12 > etc. > > And another series using metric dimensions (mm): > > 6032 - 6.0 x 3.2 > 7343 - 7.3 x 4.3 > etc. > > Hmmm, now that I look at my own library parts, I'm not so sure about those > metric size parts. Can somebody else please confirm this? > > Steve Hendrix > > ____________________________________________________________ > You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum > > To Post messages: > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Unsubscribe and Other Options: > http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com > > Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004): > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] > > Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current): > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] > ____________________________________________________________ You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum To Post messages: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe and Other Options: http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004): http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current): http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] ____________________________________________________________ You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum To Post messages: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe and Other Options: http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004): http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current): http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] ____________________________________________________________ You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum To Post messages: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe and Other Options: http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004): http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current): http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
