Brian

Yes, I am interested.

Would the script also support import of generic devices to library? As
well as pin attributes for them from CSV, tab/space delimited or GDS
file? 

Double bonus if you have the time.

John 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Guralnick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 24 November 2004 13:02
> To: Protel EDA Discussion List
> Subject: Re: SOLVED! Re: [PEDA] Problem updating designators 
> / pin swapping
> 
>     I was thinking about putting support for 
> auto-pin-swapping in P99se via a basic client script.  I know 
> I can get it to work with Altera's Quartus & it's IC-pinout 
> export&import function.  Anyone else interested?
> 
> ________
> Brian G.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ian Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Protel EDA Discussion List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:08 AM
> Subject: Re: SOLVED! Re: [PEDA] Problem updating designators 
> / pin swapping
> 
> 
> > On 03:18 PM 24/11/2004, Matt Polak said:
> >>At 04:19 PM 11/23/2004, you wrote:
> >>
> >>>         My question would be simply: What is the 
> recommended procedure 
> >>> for updating the PCB's components and netlist when 
> gate-swapping between 
> >>> parts in the schematics set under DXP? Are there any 
> hints or gotcha's 
> >>> to watch out for?
> >>
> >>         Never mind - turns out the footprint libraries somehow got 
> >> unloaded in the working process! Doh! Everything is happy now.
> >>
> >>>         By the by, DXP2004 has been touting pin and 
> gate-swapping as 
> >>> part of the new package. Has anyone used it yet who can 
> comment on it 
> >>> being a useful (and working) feature?
> >>
> >>         Thanks for your comments on this one, Ian! I 
> definitely wish 
> >> there were a little easier way to just say "Here, ALL of 
> *these* FPGA 
> >> pins are GPIO and can be swapped on the fly. Let me 
> connect the currently 
> >> routing net trace to any one of THESE pins." so routing 
> would be easier, 
> >> or similar. I guess I won't be thinking of switching to 
> DXP2004 any time 
> >> soon - we just figured out most of the insanity with the 
> 99SE to DXP 
> >> transition in the past few months!
> >
> > If you are using DXP then it is pretty much a no-brainer to 
> switch to 
> > P2004 (with one small exception that I know of, and even 
> then I would go 
> > back to DXP only when I needed to).  There are way too many 
> improvements 
> > in P2004, and the forthcoming SP2, to ignore.  All 
> registered DXP owners 
> > should have received P2004 as a free upgrade.
> >
> > If you want pin swapping on FPGAs without doing an 
> underlying FPGA project 
> > in P2004 (or Nexar), I suspect this would not be too hard 
> to arrange - 
> > just do a dummy FPGA project which sets out the appropriate 
> swap groups 
> > and it should work OK - as long as you are using one of the 
> supported 
> > FPGAs.  The PCB changes can then be pushed back to the Sch, 
> if you are 
> > prepared to use auto-generated FPGA sheet that is created 
> when linking an 
> > PrjFPGA to a PrjPCB.
> >
> > So, there may be some helpful work-arounds that could be 
> done to help with 
> > pin swapping on FPGAs even if your FPGA is not being 
> designed in the 
> > P2004/Nexar environment - haven't thought about it in 
> detail. Others on 
> > the DXP forum may have some ideas about this.
> >
> > (The only exception, I can think of to go back to DXP, is 
> that P2004 no 
> > longer includes support for CUPL for simple PLDs.)
> >
> > Ian
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum
> >
> > To Post messages:
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Unsubscribe and Other Options:
> > http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com
> >
> > Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
> >
> > Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
> >
> > 
> 
> 
>  
> ____________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum
> 
> To Post messages:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Unsubscribe and Other Options:
> http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com
> 
> Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>  
> Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
> 
> 


____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to