_________
Brian G.

A software arc test:

   Make 6 1 mil thick circles in PCB,
1 -> 1 inch diameter,
2 -> 1.003 inch,
3 -> 0.100 mil,
4 -> 0.103 mil
5 -> 0.010 mil,
6 -> 0.013 mil.

Generate a software arc based gerber, then on a new PCB, import.

Zoom in and compare. Also, assign separate nets, using select by connected copper, and play with the clearance rule.


Also, is it possible that the aperature matching tolerance setting may affect the definition of the software arcs. I think if I remember correctly, in the older Protel PCB, there was even another rounding/definition settings to the gerber generator.

________
Brian G.



----- Original Message ----- From: "Abd ul-Rahman Lomax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Discussion List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 11:28 AM
Subject: RE: [PEDA] arcs in Gerber go the wrong way


"Software arcs" suffer from the problem that they are a series of straight-line draws. The program does not give any opinion, as far as I have ever noticed, to control the number of draws per angular measure. My sense, though, is that the deviation would not be great; I'd be surprised to see more than a mil.

But I haven't, for many years, looked at this. I do know that Protel, with small arcs, draws an awful lot of very short segments and should not have this problem. So it would probably occur with large arcs. A little experimentation would show how Protel actually treats the arcs and what the maximum deviation could be. It would then be easy to avoid the clearance problem by creating the arcs a little oversize and then backing them off to the final value.

I liked software arcs because they are easier to import across CAD platforms, and the data can be more easily manipulated. The RS274X arc command is a tad complicated....


____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[email protected]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]



____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[email protected]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to