Geoff Harland wrote:

><snip>
>But as long as their (prevailing) customers continue to accept what they are 
>being served up with, and don't complain more vigorously than what they have 
>been doing, I would find it very difficult to believe that the quality of the 
>software would, or actually has, improved to any significant extent. However I 
>have now had a gutsful of trying to improve matters; my efforts in that regard 
>have not been given the level of respect which I would regard as appropriate, 
>and it seems that most of the (prevailing) users are nowhere near as bothered 
>as I am about numerous defects in the software which simply shouldn't be 
>there. And as I suspect that various people on this list think that I am 
>grumbling without good cause, and are not of an inclination to back me when I 
>refer to matters concerning software quality, I've had enough. Good luck when 
>it comes to trying to improve matters, as I won't be making any more efforts 
>myself.
>  
>
A truly sad case, but not real news to most of us.  That is why I am 
still on P99SE SP6,
because I haven't seen any features that I really HAVE to have.  The 
only yrhing that looks
like significant improvement is handling boards with many similar 
channels.  I have some
techniques I have worked out on P99 that handle the problem, but it is 
not elegant or
automatic.  I also think reliability (both from a crashing standpoint as 
well as a quality of the
error checking, etc.) is a MAJOR concern.  P99SE with all the updates 
and fixes still has a
few things that could be considered bugs, there are workarounds that 
keep you from
falling into them pretty reliably.  But, overall, once you know "the 
ropes" it is a very
stable package, and gets the job done.  I still post-view my Gerber 
layers to catch any
dumb screw-ups, but if Protel's DRC says it is OK, I don't sit up at 
night sweating that the
boards will come back with serious flaws.

I just got another mailing from Altium a couple months ago, and glanced 
at the glitzy
pictures in the flyer, but had a zero probability I'd send them any more 
of my money.
I'm waiting for an open-source package that runs under Linux to come 
along that can match
the functionality of P99.  I may be waiting a long time.....

Jon


 
____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[email protected]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to