Edwina, List, Peirce's and French's arguments are neither *essentially* concerned with religion nor evolution; and perhaps least of all with economics. Rather, they present a stark ethical difference: One either principally acts out of a relatively selfless sense of oneness with one's community or, contrariwise, primarily out of a selfish desire for wealth and power.
Perhaps this would become clearer if you read French's essay which I'd be happy to send you. Btw, Trump does indeed have spiritual advisers and they are, in French's and my opinion, nut jobs, one, for example, offering those who donate to his 'ministry' the certainty of having "personal angels" as a heavenly reward. Best, Gary R On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 10:20 PM Edwina Taborsky <[email protected]> wrote: > List, Gary > > I don’t know anything about President Trump’s ‘religious advisors’[ if he > even indeed has such] but I think that David French’s article has little > that is analagous with Peirce’s three modes of evolution -and certainly, > both evolution and religion have nothing to do with the economic > infrastructure of a nation. > > Both evolution and economics rest, in my view, on pragmatic reality, on > facts that can be empirically verified. Evolution is a biological reality - > and all three Peircean methods, in my view, function [ tychastic random > chance; anancastic mechanical continuity and agapastic networking > filiation]. The strongest is, agapastic networking since its information > gathering from all its networks enables functional, constructive > adaptation. But all three exist... > > With regard to economics, these processes include the three bases of > Investment/Production/Consumption . Even a small agricultural community > has to avoid using all its products [seeds, animals] in order to plant next > years crops. > > Religious beliefs are pure ideologies - and to contrast, as French has > done, a religious behaviour that focuses on ‘ a contented middle class > life[what economic mode enables this? Esther only the middle-class in this > society? Where does Investment come from?] with ’the prosperity church’ [ > what economic mode enables this?] is a false Either-Or framework. And > cannot, in my view,be linked to an economic mode. > > Just my immediate reaction… > > Edwina Taborsky > > On Apr 2, 2025, at 9:40 PM, Gary Richmond <[email protected]> wrote: > > List, > > The lead article in David French's NYT newsletter today, "Trump’s > religious advisers have a peculiar view of Christianity." immediately > made me think of Peirce's sharp contrast between what he characterized as > the Gospel of Greed as fully opposed to the Gospel of Christ (elsewhere > referred to by Peirce as the Gospel of Love). Peirce writes (in a long > passage regarding what came to be known as "Social Darwinism": > > Here, then, is the issue. The gospel of Christ [or Love] says that > progress comes from every individual merging his individuality in sympathy > with his neighbors. On the other side, the conviction of the nineteenth > century is that progress takes place by virtue of every individual's > striving for himself with all his might and trampling his neighbor under > foot whenever he gets a chance to do so. This may accurately be called the > Gospel of Greed. CP 6.294 > > A brief excerpt from French's piece can perhaps serve as a kind of summary > of it, although an appreciation of the full depth and breadth of his > argumentation requires, I think, a reading of it in its entirety. > Ordinarily, at this point I would put a link to the article, but it's a > "subscribers' only" piece so I can't. (If the url I've placed at the bottom > of this message doesn't work and you'd like to read French's article, email > me off-List and I'll forward it to you.) > > While other traditions may respect the quiet, humble pastor who loves and > serves his community from, say, a modest parsonage or lives a contented, > middle-class life, the pastor of the prosperity church glories in his > wealth and power. > > In fact, these pastors often teach that the most concrete way you can > manifest your own faith and thus receive God’s blessing is by giving > ever-greater amounts to the pastor’s ministry. You demonstrate your faith > by sacrificing to enrich your pastor. > > Traditional Christians are used to giving money to help the poor and to > keep the lights on at church. Christians who follow the prosperity gospel > give money for the pastor’s mansion, and — in extreme cases — the > pastor’s jet > <https://nl.nytimes.com/f/a/qdgUUXu9jfrcBXkYZy9afA~~/AAAAARA~/YePAwH1qCDz4-skI2Gy3Hpg6b4mZQ6ulvy2EfBLmgYXHgxjcnrnFzcobr41yVCOTxocs2OqJKRSF1gu7LbN4sGIYx234QcW7jfFocI6hyl6Xx7BUi8TmihRRH0Bve0JRWUcxpxgG5b_4Ck0xq7Azfl5Gckg1VYrsESSYZ4fX_ZSRJfVdnEGh26IAodU_i3mMjvwqz55_mVBxNkrTF-v2U3JsuVZ9YgRgMwivhBzBreGNRanfimiQsnIxxL4b5QxSfobGMaSpGQ1feb7oYfeUfoHOz7Ff5xDGD1JL2oYJoFhKezM8k657nowGZc4uI7mT-Y-4ovoHu1mwKUOuxkTv_BvBvgFEzjjHM4rWibvDlMQQpsrTlTmgupZupLsVMPk6WasIBasgvMRWh58wlr764pRON3V-lgm7OK1IyMRku7kuAHAroxZaHYUD6h_VqmSv> > . > > But here’s where things get truly strange. These congregations don’t love > the pastor in spite of his obvious exploitation. They give to him or her > enthusiastically, inspired by the pastor’s wealth, hoping that by providing > him or her their absolute devotion (including their financial resources) > they, too, will one day enjoy the same wealth and power. > > Think of it as a kind of investment strategy — pastors promise believers > that they’ll receive a “hundredfold” return on their gifts (twisting a > passage in the Gospel of Mark > <https://nl.nytimes.com/f/a/zC-8ildg2Qw8sxw-5Ew0Zw~~/AAAAARA~/-iN_xZjuxd0QP4s5G38UdSMcMUCkoU-TZGMUtN9xZXpwnGYN2c1xPUaUzCNL2fsItKUZ-Oyfk1U-zSVA-fyTB7zy4ypJ9fpMmlDj5GUOQirDQJNyeBiOohE-zZujatqHhTtBoZBs4rx6_WkMSpQAPyxPNWtlhobQl2Bp-AijKkRmmLb4sBB0-reUmtcZHQFtr1eVdlo9UmE5go4C1TTeP0bfcQHy7NZmRg1lFFVGvqsNsWGhXJ_s33AcNtEYlOlIZyRBdcoz1ymVJu23JMUxg_seKO5YVph6mUPqaGg1FrnWBum4Y04vBcZCcovssSuPHOf9iqYmFGFW2wRpZzoa6dYU_OZvQIepQw7PyXSrnZI~> > ). > > In his article, French argues that the contrast between what he calls > "humble Christians" and their megachurch counterparts has never been > clearer. In his view authentic Christians (and, in my view, true humanists > of all stripes and sects, religious or not) are guided by humility and > selflessness, live to some large extent to serve others, and prioritize > love in the form of faith, charity, and at least the hope of community. > Meanwhile, major megachurch figures embody a brand of (again in my view) > pseudo- or even anti-Christianity that glorifies wealth, power, and > personal gain; they offer "blessings" (material ones, like eventual great > wealth, but also bizarre "spiritual" ones, like personal 'angels' as > discussed in the article) in exchange for hefty donations. > > The *prosperity gospel* they preach distorts faith into a *transactional > system* where believers are encouraged to enrich their pastors in hopes > of "divine favor." Unlike the humble pastor who dedicates his life to > service, these leaders revel in material excess (see the link above of the > mega-pastor with a fleet of jets), mirroring the values of the political > figures they endorse. The rise of independent charismatic churches -- led > by self-appointed, unchecked leaders -- further deepens this, in my view, > tragic distortion, promoting a worldview where power and wealth signal > divine approval. > > So while historically the true "heart" of Christianity (and Buddhism, > Hinduism, Islam, etc. and non-religious humanism of all stripes) has > emphasized humility, sacrifice, and concern for the poor, this perverse new > "theology" celebrates dominance, prosperity, and even a dangerous, > quasi-messianic view of political figures like Donald Trump. So French > counsels that, just as Martin Luther once nailed his 95 Theses in protest > of indulgences, today’s humble Christians especially (but also all truly > human-centered folk) must challenge the corruption that has infiltrated > their faith, thus rejecting the Gospel of Greed and returning to a Gospel > of Love and Grace. > David French's article > > https://messaging-custom-newsletters.nytimes.com/dynamic/render?campaign_id=292&emc=edit_df_20250402&instance_id=151659&isViewInBrowser=true&nl=david-french&productCode=DF®i_id=68716072&segment_id=195096&sendId=195096&uri=nyt://newsletter/bbcb3660-d70a-598d-94c4-00d89fd25ad8&user_id=b1422b225dd9c2c469ac06c116c9fb08 > > Best, > > Gary R > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > ARISBE: THE PEIRCE GATEWAY is now at > https://cspeirce.com and, just as well, at > https://www.cspeirce.com . It'll take a while to repair / update all the > links! > ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON > PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] > . > ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] > with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in > the body. More at https://list.iu.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . > ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and > co-managed by him and Ben Udell. > > >
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ARISBE: THE PEIRCE GATEWAY is now at https://cspeirce.com and, just as well, at https://www.cspeirce.com . It'll take a while to repair / update all the links! ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the body. More at https://list.iu.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.
