Edwina, List,

I agree entirely with what Edwina has said regarding R. Marty's work. Peirce 
lives or dies with respect to the kind of work R. Marty has done here where the 
structuralism, necessarily deduced from Peirce's writings, is given 
mathematically and precisely (in numerical structure). Far more valuable, in my 
opinion, than arguments ad nauseum over the precision of certain terms. Indeed, 
following the work done one could switch out all of Peirce's terms and retain 
his basic structure —which is surely the "scientific" point. (arbitary state 
grammars, etc, with respect to a structuralism which Peirce understood to be 
non-arbtirary).

Best
Jack
________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of 
Edwina Taborsky <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2025 2:41 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: robert marty <[email protected]>; edwina Taborsky 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Indexicality and Speculative Grammar (was Facts, 
Opinion, Perspective, and Inquiry)

List

Robert Marty provided us with a lattice of the ten classes of triadic signs- 
and referred to them as showing ‘a phenomenological principle of embodiments’.

I think that should be the focus - not the terms that Peirce used - but the 
actuality of semiosis. What does semiosis do? It is an organizational process 
that ‘embodies’ energy/matter/information into one form, and then, enables the 
transformation of this form with its energy/matter/information content…into 
another morphological form. This suggests that semiosis organizes 
energy/matter/information - and both ADDS to one embodiment..and/or REMOVES 
from an embodiment. And also- reorganizes try content...

Robert has shown this in his lattice, where. For example, a Dicent Indexical 
Legisign [322] a street cry] embodies Rheumatic Indexical Legisigns [321] a 
demonstrative pronoun…Notice that the Dicent has picked up information, or 
added information, to that Rhematic triad. It’s moved from an interpretant in 
Firstness to one in Secondness - it’s more specific and focused. Now- how did 
it do this? Where did this extra information come from? Is it the Legisign 
process that is transforming this morphology?

Edwina

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON 
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . 
►  <a href="mailto:[email protected]?subject=SIG%20peirce-l";>UNSUBSCRIBE FROM 
PEIRCE-L</a> . But, if your subscribed email account is not your default email 
account, then go to
https://list.iu.edu/sympa/signoff/peirce-l .
► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP;  moderated by Gary Richmond;  and 
co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

Reply via email to