---------- Forwarded message --------- From: suteerth vajpeyi <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025, 3:23 pm Subject: Why do practical consequences constitute the sole interpretant of a sign ? To: Peirce-L <[email protected]>
Respected members, I know that this question is a tough one but it really needs answering. As per C.S. Peirce, the meaning of any conception is exhaustively elaborated by the pragmatic maxim. I want to see a demonstration or proof of this fact for it is not self evident, at least not to me. It has been decades since interest in the work of Peirce has risen. Many members of this group are illustrious and have written books of their own. I do not think that zero people have worked on this question and if there is no definitive answer already found, atleast we could have a blueprint of the present state of inquiry regarding this question. So with that, I invite you all to share your thoughts on the matter...
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . ► <a href="mailto:[email protected]";>UNSUBSCRIBE FROM PEIRCE-L</a> . But, if your subscribed email account is not your default email account, then go to https://list.iu.edu/sympa/signoff/peirce-l . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.
