PEIRCE’S FIRST FOOTNOTE TO “Questions Concerning Certain
Faculties…”, Ep P. 11
-x-      [EP page 11]
The word “intuitus” first occurs as a term in St. Anselm’s
MONOLOGIUM. He wished to distinguish between our knowledge of God and our
knowledge of finite things (and in the next world, of God, also); and thinking
of the saying of St. Paul , Videmus nunc per speculum in ænigmate: tunc autem
facie ad faciem, he called the former “speculation” and the later “intuition”.
This use of “speculation” did not take root because that word [page 12]
already had another exact and widely different meaning. In the middle ages, the
term “intuitive cognition” had two principle senses, 1st, as opposed to
abstractive cognition it meant the knowledge of present as present, and this is
its meaning in Anselm; but 2nd, as no intuitive cognition was
allowed to be determined by a previous cognition, it came to be used as the 
opposite
of discursive cognition (see Scotus, IN SENTENTIUS, lib. 2, dist. 3, qu. 9),
and this is nearly the sense in which I employ it. This is also nearly the
sense in which Kant uses it, the former distinction being expressed by his 
“sensuous”
and “non-sensuous”. (See WERKE, herausg. Rosenkrantz, Thl 2, S. 713, 31, 41,
100, u. s. w.) An enumeration of six meanings of intuition may be found in
Hamilton’d REID, P. 759.
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to