Gary M, to answer your question about my previous post, where I wrote "But this 
general person [God] is still not real independently of the believer’s belief" —

 

My point was that the pragmatic effects of belief in [a benign] God are real 
and observable only because the believers have actually produced them. It’s 
analogous to, say, a belief in Hamlet: he’s a real character for me because he 
has a virtual existence independent of my beliefs about him, or any actor’s 
performance of the role, etc. But that existence is dependent on his being 
created by Shakespeare. (Questions about a historical Hamlet are irrelevant to 
the reality of the character, of course.) It’s more paradoxical in the case of 
religious believers who have created the object of their belief by acting in 
accordance with its reality, because for the most part they have to believe not 
only that God’s reality is independent of their belief, but that they 
themselves are dependent on Him! (Unless their belief works something like the 
“controlled folly” of Carlos Castaneda … )

 

gary f.

 

} You cannot see any thing until you are clear of it. [Thoreau] {

 <http://www.gnusystems.ca/gnoxic.htm> www.gnusystems.ca/gnoxic.htm }{ gnoxics

 

From: Gary Moore [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 22-Jun-14 3:45 PM



to Gary Fuhrman:

 

I agree with your comment, although I recognize the cultural pull (or 
intimidation) to recognize, even though it is just a pure intellectual 
principle", "God" as a "person". This might justly be considered "irrational" 
but it certainly is cultural and inbred into most languages, ergo an 
'opportunity' to convert "connotational" intensional language into seeming 
"denotational" extensional language 'as if' pointing to something really 
present at hand. 

-x-

Could you explain your sentence, "But this general person is still not real 
independently of the believer’s belief" which was not fully clear to me.

 

Gary C. Moore

 

-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to