Steven, List:

On Jun 20, 2014, at 12:43 PM, Stephen C. Rose wrote:

> If Triadic Philosophy has any claim to originality it might be in the third 
> term in its root triad which is Aesthetics.


A critical comment, if I may...

At a deep level, the origins and the dictionary meanings of words are always 
fundamental when one seeks to communicate a perplex meaning to a colleagues and 
wider readerships.

Please consider the following entry in the Apple Dictionary:

aesthetic |esˈTHetik|(also esthetic )
adjective
concerned with beauty or the appreciation of beauty: the pictures give great 
aesthetic pleasure.
• giving or designed to give pleasure through beauty; of pleasing appearance.
noun [ in sing. ]
a set of principles underlying and guiding the work of a particular artist or 
artistic movement: the Cubist aesthetic.
DERIVATIVES
aesthetically |-ik(ə)lē|adverb [ as submodifier ] : an aesthetically pleasing 
color combination
ORIGIN late 18th cent. (in the sense ‘relating to perception by the senses’): 
from Greek aisthētikos, from aisthēta ‘perceptible things,’ from aisthesthai 
‘perceive.’ The sense ‘concerned with beauty’ was coined in German in the mid 
18th cent. and adopted into English in the early 19th cent., but its use was 
controversial until late in the century.

If one bases the meaning on the German invention "concerned with beauty", one 
becomes entrained in mental pathways that "are in the eye of the beholder".
If one bases the meaning of aesthetics on the original Greek root, one becomes 
entrained in mental pathways of a broader sort.  In particular, one notes that 
perceptive minds perceive realistic signs and ethical boundaries.
This interpretation raises a red flag for me.  In what sense are the base terms 
of a triadic philosophy independent of one another, or is triadic philosophy 
rooted in three interdependent terms?
Finally, what would be your preference - three independent terms or three 
interdependent terms?  The nature of the associative logic will be related to 
your choice.

Cheers
Jerry


-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to