Phyllis,

I am not sure, but you might try looking into the Carus archives at
SIU-Carbondale if you really need an answer. They have a lot of that
material there--I was a research archivist for the Carus archives for a
year and saw much of that. Sadly, I didn't work on that part of the
archive. Perhaps you could as Douglas Anderson at SIU, since if he doesn't
know there might be a yound Peircean there who might.

Jason Hills


On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Phyllis Chiasson <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Listers,
>
> I am reading Paul Carus's translation of the Tao, in which he uses the
> term, Reason, for Tao. E.g. " The Reason that can be Reasoned is not the
> eternal Reason."
>
> Since Carus & Peirce were connected, does anyone know if use of the term,
> Reason, for Tao comes from Peirce, or relates to Peirce's correlation of
> reason & God? To the highest level of his Ethical classes of motives
> (religionism) as Reason? To Retroduction (reason) as the operative engine
> of the universe, etc.
>
> I'm wondering, among other things who influenced whom in this choice of
> terms. I'm guessing Peirce to Carus.... But could it have been the other
> way around? Is there another source?
>
> Regards,
> Phyllis
>
>
> -----------------------------
> PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
> PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
> [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L
> but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the
> BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm
> .
>
>
>
>
>
>
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to