A nominalist in name only would be a nominal nominalist.
But a real nominalist would be a contradiction in terms.
Checkmate ...
Jon
Benjamin Udell wrote:
So the question is, again, do you think that numbers can be objectively
investigated as numbers? - such that (individually, biologically, etc.)
various intelligences, proceeding from the same assumptions, would reach
the same conclusions. If you do think so, then you are a nominalist or
anti-realist in name only.
--
academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey
my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/
inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA
oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey
facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
