Thread: SEZ:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15849 SB:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15878 JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15879 SB:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15880 JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15882 BU:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15898 GR:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15899 JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15900 GR:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15901 JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15902 SEZ:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15903 SJ:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15904 SCR:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15905 JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15906 JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15907
Steven, Sung, List, Now that I have a bit more time, here's a pertinent paragraph from my essay on Differential Logic and Dynamic systems: Differential Logic and Dynamic Systems : A One-Dimensional Universe http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/Differential_Logic_and_Dynamic_Systems_2.0#A_One-Dimensional_Universe <quote> It might be thought that an independent time variable needs to be brought in at this point, but it is an insight of fundamental importance that the idea of process is logically prior to the notion of time. A time variable is a reference to a clock — a canonical, conventional process that is accepted or established as a standard of measurement, but in essence no different than any other process. This raises the question of how different subsystems in a more global process can be brought into comparison, and what it means for one process to serve the function of a local standard for others. But these inquiries only wrap up puzzles in further riddles, and are obviously too involved to be handled at our current level of approximation. The clock indicates the moment . . . . but what does eternity indicate? — Walt Whitman, Leaves of Grass, [Whi, 79] </quote> Regards, Jon On 3/21/2015 10:10 AM, Jon Awbrey wrote: > Sung, List, > > http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/Differential_Logic_and_Dynamic_Systems_2.0#A_One-Dimensional_Universe > > Regards, > > Jon > > http://inquiryintoinquiry.com > >>> On Mar 21, 2015, at 2:50 AM, Sungchul Ji<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> John, Jerry, lists, >>> >>> (1) Can we identify time with change ? With process ? >>> (2) Are there two aspects to time - the knowable and the unknowable ? >>> (3) The knowable (COGNITION) aspect of time is death with in natural sciences >>> and the unknowable aspect in art (EMOTION) and religion (BELIEF)? >>> >>> Any comments or suggestions ? >>> >>> Sung >>> (from a restaurant in Vienna, a city full of art and history/time) >>> -- academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/ inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/ isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
