See links in refs: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2013/11/15/what-weve-got-here-is-a-failure-to-communicate-6/
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com > On Mar 26, 2015, at 2:56 PM, Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> wrote: > > That's ''Embodiments of Mind''. > > Jon > > http://inquiryintoinquiry.com > >> On Mar 26, 2015, at 2:52 PM, Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Danko, >> >> Check the papers collected in his ''Embodied Mind''. That's probably where >> I read it. >> >> Jon >> >> http://inquiryintoinquiry.com >> >>> On Mar 26, 2015, at 1:18 PM, Danko Nikolic <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Dear Jon, >>> >>> I never heard of that statement from McCulloch. But it sounds resonable. >>> So, I will have to check it out. >>> >>> Thank you for that. >>> >>> Danko >>> >>>> On 26/03/15 17:25, Jon Awbrey wrote: >>>> Danko, List, >>>> >>>> On mobile and not able to read your paper right now, so maybe you already >>>> mentioned this, but I recall W.S. McCulloch wrote something about “the >>>> reticular formation that marshals our abductions” and he was quite up on >>>> Peirce early on. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Jon >>>> >>>> http://inquiryintoinquiry.com >>>> >>>>> On Mar 26, 2015, at 11:01 AM, Danko Nikolic >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Dear members of Peirce list, >>>>> >>>>> I would like to bring to your attention the upcoming theoretical >>>>> paper in Journal of Theoretical Biology entitled "Practopoiesis: Or how >>>>> life fosters a mind". The paper proposes neurophysiological/cybernetic >>>>> account of >>>>> abductive reasoning, as introduced by Peirce. >>>>> >>>>> As I am not an expert of Perice's work (I am foremost a neuroscientist) >>>>> but my theory seems to apply to his contribution to logic, I would >>>>> appreciate very much any critical feedback. Have I understood abduction >>>>> right? Or did I misted out on something? >>>>> >>>>> Also, if there is anything else relevant from Peirce's work that I should >>>>> pay attention to, I would appreciate knowing. For example, the theory of >>>>> practopoiesis makes very specific suggestions of how the meaning >>>>> (semantics) is dealt with within neural systems. I don't know how much >>>>> this particular proposal is in agreement or in discord with Peirce's work >>>>> on meaning. >>>>> >>>>> One can download a pre-print of the paper here: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.danko-nikolic.com/practopoiesis/ >>>>> >>>>> Thank you very much, and please do not hesitate to address to me any >>>>> well-deserved criticism. >>>>> >>>>> With best regards, >>>>> >>>>> Danko Nikolic >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Prof. Dr. Danko Nikolić >>>>> >>>>> Web: >>>>> http://www.danko-nikolic.com >>>>> >>>>> Mail address 1: >>>>> Department of Neurophysiology >>>>> Max Planck Institut for Brain Research >>>>> Deutschordenstr. 46 >>>>> 60528 Frankfurt am Main >>>>> GERMANY >>>>> >>>>> Mail address 2: >>>>> Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies >>>>> Wolfgang Goethe University >>>>> Ruth-Moufang-Str. 1 >>>>> 60433 Frankfurt am Main >>>>> GERMANY >>>>> >>>>> ---------------------------- >>>>> Office: (..49-69) 96769-736 >>>>> Lab: (..49-69) 96769-209 >>>>> Fax: (..49-69) 96769-327 >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> ---------------------------- >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Prof. Dr. Danko Nikolić >>> >>> Web: >>> http://www.danko-nikolic.com >>> >>> Mail address 1: >>> Department of Neurophysiology >>> Max Planck Institut for Brain Research >>> Deutschordenstr. 46 >>> 60528 Frankfurt am Main >>> GERMANY >>> >>> Mail address 2: >>> Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies >>> Wolfgang Goethe University >>> Ruth-Moufang-Str. 1 >>> 60433 Frankfurt am Main >>> GERMANY >>> >>> ---------------------------- >>> Office: (..49-69) 96769-736 >>> Lab: (..49-69) 96769-209 >>> Fax: (..49-69) 96769-327 >>> [email protected] >>> ---------------------------- >>>
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
