Thread:
AM:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/16107
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/16133
AM:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/16142
Dr. Mani, List,
I don't recall learning anything about semi-sets or type-2 fuzzy sets,
unless those might involve the usual sort of iterative meta-fuzziness.
As a general rule, especially in relation to Peircean triadicity,
the direction of generalization from dyadic to triadic relations
is more important than generalizing the number of values in the
relational domains. I have often discussed this under the head
of -adic vs. -tomic extensions.
I have also looked at generalizing the dyadic membership relation
of ordinary set theory to a triadic "relative membership" relation.
I will look up links to that.
I was just about to start another thread for addressing Jeff's questions,
but I'm moving kinda slow right now and it may take another few spins of
this dizzy planet.
Regards,
Jon
On 4/8/2015 2:15 PM, A. Mani wrote:
Jon,
2.
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/12/07/triadic-relations-intentions-fuzzy-subsets-2/
3.
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/12/07/triadic-relations-intentions-fuzzy-subsets-3/
We need a separate thread for this.
I would be more interested in how you formulate semi-sets and type-2 fuzzy sets.
Regards
A. Mani
--
academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey
my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/
inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA
oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey
facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
