Thread: JW:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/16529 JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/16535
Here is the series of blog posts on Chapter 3 (The Logic of Relatives) in Peirce's 1880 “Algebra Of Logic” up to the point where I left off on May Day. Preliminaries http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/01/30/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-preliminaries/ Selection 1 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/02/01/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-selection-1/ Selection 2 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/02/03/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-selection-2/ Selection 3 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/02/11/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-selection-3/ Selection 4 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/02/12/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-selection-4/ Selection 5 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/02/15/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-selection-5/ Selection 6 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/02/16/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-selection-6/ Selection 7 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/02/28/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-selection-7/ Selection 8 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/03/12/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-selection-8/ Comment 7.1 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/04/13/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-comment-7-1/ Comment 7.2 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/04/19/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-comment-7-2/ Comment 7.3 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/04/23/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-comment-7-3/ Comment 7.4 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/04/24/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-comment-7-4/ Comment 7.5 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/05/01/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-comment-7-5/ Up to this point we are still dealing mainly with dyadic relations, and as interesting as those may be, especially to a graph theorist, the level of complexity we need to quicken semiotics does not come into play until we reach the playing field of triadic relations. Regards, Jon -- academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/ inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/ isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
