Gary, List,
you are right Gary, but there is still a strange behavior in most of us Peirce-listers... we read and study Peirce, but then we write and understand was is written in a strict 'positivist' way. Since everything is a sign and every sign has to be considered triadic... then of course in "human instinct" there has to be more than ONLY knowledge... because knowledge can not 'exist alone'... I think, without having never studied this subject thoroughly, that instinct is some how related to secondness, to a more (so to say) 'biological' aspect, and though to the "impossible", to "the real" in Lacan, and so on... And by the way, I am also aware that we are not completely aware, or conscious, of all what we 'really' know... and more, besides what we know and what we don't know that we know, there is the unconscious (that also exists), and works, not always, in favor of what we are able to think rationally.
All the best
Claudio


Gary Richmond escribió el 15/07/2015 a las 02:34 p.m.:
Claudio, list,

Claudio wrote: "I would say that instinct is not related to knowledge, but abduction and habit are.
There is no 'good' abduction without knowledge...
​"​

I'm not certain that I agree with the first part of this statement, viz., "that instinct is not related to knowledge," but that is a complex issue which would take some considerable work to address adequately (Manuel's snippet and my previous long Peircean quote, as well as the passage below may suggest a path which such an inquiry might take).

But I fully agree with the second part of your comment, viz. that "there is no 'good' abduction without knowledge," what Peirce calls "the well-prepared mind" making good guesses leading to, in the following example, correct hypotheses in science (something not dissimilar must surely be the case in art, architecture, etc., I'm sure you'd agree).

    . . . Yes; it must be confessed that if we knew that the impulse
    to prefer one hypothesis to another really were analogous to the
    instincts of birds and wasps, it would be foolish not to give it
    play, within the bounds of reason; especially since we must
    entertain some hypothesis, or else forego all further knowledge
    than that which we have already gained by that very means. But is
    it a fact that man possesses this magical faculty? Not, I reply,
    to the extent of guessing right the first time, nor perhaps the
    second; but /that the well-prepared mind has wonderfully soon
    guessed each secret of nature is historical truth. All the
    theories of science have been so obtained /[emphasis added].

    But may they not have come fortuitously, or by some such
    modification of chance as the Darwinian supposes? I answer that
    three or four independent methods of computation show that it
    would be ridiculous to suppose our science to have so come to
    pass. [. . .] There is a reason, an interpretation, a logic, in
    the course of scientific advance, and this indisputably proves to
    him who has perceptions of rational or significant relations, that
    man's mind must have been attuned to the truth of things in order
    to discover what he has discovered. It is the very bedrock of
    logical truth. CP 6.476


Best,

Gary

Gary Richmond*
*
*
*
*Gary Richmond*
*Philosophy and Critical Thinking*
*Communication Studies*
*LaGuardia College of the City University of New York*
*C 745*
*718 482-5690*

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Claudio Guerri <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



    -----------------------------
    PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to
    REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> . To
    UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> with the line
    "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
    http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .








--
Local

Prof. Dr. Arq. Claudio F. Guerri
Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Urbanismo
Universidad de Buenos Aires
Domicilio particular: Gral. Lemos 270
1427 BUENOS AIRES
Telefax: (011) 4553-7976/4895
Celular: (011) 15-6289-8123
E-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to