Edwina, List:

I have to run, but it sounds like you are saying that a Rheme only has an
immediate interpretant, a Dicent has both a dynamic interpretant and an
immediate interpretant, and an Argument has all three interpretants.  Is
that right?  If so, I have not seen anyone make that claim before; I have
always been under the impression that all signs have all three
interpretants--just like all signs have both objects--and that each can be
divided into First, Second, and Third.  Hence Peirce's terminology of
Hypothetic/Categorical/Relative for Ii, Sympathetic/Shocking/Usual for Id,
and Gratific/To produce action/To product self-control for If.  What am I
missing?

Regards,

Jon

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Edwina Taborsky <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm not sure what you mean by the 'three divisions of each'. Are you
> saying that, for example, the Dynamic Interpretant, which is in a
> categorical mode of Secondness, and is an 'actuality'...is also...in 'three
> divisions'...by which I am guessing you mean, in the three categories of
> Firstness, Secondness and Thirdness?
>
> I don't see that. I can see that a triadic Sign can be made up of all
> three categories, but I don't see how ONE Relation (eg, that between the
> Representamen and the Immediate Interpretant)...can be made up of all three
> categories. The triadic Sign might, for example, not include any more
> intensive interpretation than the Immediate Interpretant (a rheme). Or, it
> might include TWO Interpretants - with the first one, the Immediate, being
> a rheme in Firstness and the next one, the Dynamic, being a dicent in
> Secondness...and it might not continue on to a Final Interpretant.
>
> Edwina
>
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to