Hi Ed, Thanks for your interesting suggestion that the geometric principle of tetraktys may underlie all organizations, including the organization in Mona Lisa.
Since I have been led to conclude in 1991 [1] that all organizations in the Universe are driven by *energy dissipation *under the *control of information *and hence obey the so-called the *Gnergy Principle of Organization (GPO)* symbolized by a tetrahedron whose 4 apexes being occupied by *Energy, Matter, Information* and *Life* [1, 2], there may be some theoretical connection between the geometric principle of *tetraktys *and the *gnergy tetrahedron*. For one thing, the tetraktys contains all the numbers that the gnergy tetrahedron does: 1 = Gnergy, 2 = Information and Energy, 3 = Complementarity as a triadic principle, and 4 = the tetrahedron as the simplex of the 3-dimensional space. I wonder if tetraktys is a MATHEMATICAL principle, whereas the gnergy tetrahedron is a PHYSICAL principle. All the best. Sung References: [1] Ji, S. (1991). Molecular Theories of Cell Life and Death. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick. Pp. 152-163, 230-237. [2] Ji, S. (2012). Molecular Theory of the Living Cell: Concepts, Molecular Mechanisms, and Biomedical Applications. Sprigner, New York. Pp. 17, 28. On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Ed Dellian <ed.dell...@t-online.de> wrote: > Sung, > > what makes Mona Lisa beautiful is indeed ORGANIZATION on the canvas (not > only of matter, by the way: just think of "light" and "colours"). But > organization *according to which principles*? The answer is: according to > GEOMETRIC principles! Be sure that whenever you are struck by BEAUTY there > is the "medial section" at work. It stimulates the EXPERIENCE OF HARMONY in > the human soul. What is the "medial section"? It is a quaternary geometric > proportion A : B = C : D, the "tetraktys" of the ancients, well-known to > Renaissance artists as well as Renaissance scientists (Galileo, for > instance, and Newton), being the basic true and rational organization > principle of beauty, harmony, reality and truth. It is present in the > double helix (so it is not restricted to the realm of lifelessness!). It is > present in the theory of motion, where it works according to the quaternary > proportion "cause to effect equals element of space to element of time". A > symbolic representation of this proportion is the formula E/p = c (Galileo, > Newton, Maxwell, Poynting, Planck, Einstein, Heisenberg), which is only > apparently a "triadic" formula, but actually a quaternate proportion, > because c is "element of space over element of time" (just look at the > dimensions of c). Note, by the way, that the basic mathematical "rule of > three" is also a *geometric* *quaternary **proportion*, because the > "three" are the known quantities; the fourth quantity is the unknown. A:B = > C:X represents the "rule of three" with one quantity X unknown. The > "tetraktys" is always present where rationality, reason, beauty, harmony, > and truth is present. > > Best, > Ed. > Am 25.08.2015 um 01:30 schrieb Sungchul Ji: > > Hi Gary S, Gary R, lists, > > A thought just occurred to me that there may be a connection between the > beauty of Mona Lisa (holism) and the various chemical pigments > (reductionism) that constitute it -- namely, the organization of matter at > two distinct scales, one at the macroscopic scale and the other at the > microscopic. > > That is, what makes Mona Lisa beautiful is the way macroscopic pigment > particles are ORGANIZED on its canvas, while what makes the pigment > particles look colorful in Mona Lisa is the way microscopic particles known > as atoms are ORGANIZED inside each pigment molecule. > > If this analysis is right, the concept of ORGANIZATION may be of > fundamental significance at all physical scales and the consequence (or > function or meaning) of organization may depend on the physical scales > involved. In the case of Mona Lisa, the pigment ORGANIZATION on the canvas > results in beautiful visual sensations while the atomic ORGANIZATIONs in > pigment molecules result in desirable colors of individual pigments. > > Hence, I am tempted to conclude that > > "Organization is the FUNCTOR connecting the beautiful aesthetics of Mona > Lisa on the macrolevel and the colorful chemistry underlying it on the > microlevel." > > All the best. > > Sung > > > > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Sungchul Ji <s...@rci.rutgers.edu> wrote: > >> Hi Gary S, Gary R, lists, >> >> I agree that certain aspects (e.g., qualia) of Peircean semiosis cannot >> be reduced to mechanical terms, because life is more COMPLEX than physics >> or chemistry. But I believe that no semiosis is possible without physics >> and chemistry either, since, although the beauty of Mona Lisa is beyond the >> chemical reductionism, no Mona Lisa can exist without colored dye molecules >> having the right atomic organizations. So the challenging question may be: >> >> "When does beauty begin and chemistry end in Mona Lisa?" >> >> One possible answer that comes to mind would be: >> >> "Mona Lisa is the complementary union of anesthetics and physics." >> >> All the best. >> >> Sung >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Gary Shank <garysh...@comcast.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Is this in addition to your ongoing errors of trying to portray Peircean >>> semiotics in reductionist and mechanical terms? >>> All the best, >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> On Aug 24, 2015, at 6:00 PM, Sungchul Ji <s...@rci.rutgers.edu> wrote: >>> >>> Gary, list, >>> >>> There is a minor error in Slide 23: >>> >>> R should be associated with quali, sin, and legi, and >>> >>> O should be associated with icon, index and symbol. >>> >>> All the best. >>> >>> Sung >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gary Richmond <gary.richm...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> List, >>>> >>>> Cary Campbell of the Semiotic Research Group posted this summary of a >>>> lecture, "Anticipation and Semiotics: One Cannot Not Interact" and >>>> gives a link to the accompanying ppt slideshow by Mihai Nadin (he >>>> inadvertently misspells his first name as 'Mihou') on that group's Facebook >>>> page. >>>> >>>> Many years ago I read a number of Nadin's papers and had a fascinating >>>> off-list discussion with him on his work, then focusing squarely on >>>> Peirce's semiotic theory and, as I recall, especially Peirce's >>>> understanding of virtuality. While Nadin has gone on to consider >>>> applications of semiotic theory to computer science, HCI, and other fields, >>>> it appears that his work continues to be 'grounded' in Peircean semiotics. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Gary >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Cary wrote: >>>> >>>> This is a super topical lecture from engineer/scientist/semiotician >>>> Mihou Nadin; quite inspiring. >>>> >>>> He talks about man’s current and developing relations with technology >>>> and how these relationships are slowly automating the human away; in which >>>> the emphasis has shifted, since his pioneering work in interfaces and AI, >>>> from making machines more like humans to making humans more like machines. >>>> >>>> This leads him to assert that the dynamism and complexity of life >>>> (Godel defines complexity as the ability to interact) is not reducible to >>>> the machine. Or in other words, signs (in the Peircean understanding that >>>> always open up something new to an interpreter) are not reducible to >>>> signals, which carry preformed and static data. Naturally, this calls for >>>> him to explore Peircian interpretative semiotics. >>>> >>>> Here is also a pdf of his presentation to accompany the video: >>>> http://www.nadin.ws/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/tartu_presentation.pdf >>>> <http://l.facebook.com/l/VAQGMDKVvAQGJ132n81efy1uUwZdfD1Jrw_TeQ0Vj6Gc8lA/www.uttv.ee/naita?id=22396> >>>> [image: Gary Richmond] >>>> >>>> *Gary Richmond* >>>> *Philosophy and Critical Thinking* >>>> *Communication Studies* >>>> *LaGuardia College of the City University of New York* >>>> *C 745* >>>> *718 482-5690 <718%20482-5690>* >>>> >>>> >>>> ----------------------------- >>>> PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON >>>> PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to >>>> peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to >>>> PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe >>>> PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at >>>> http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm . >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sungchul Ji, Ph.D. >>> >>> Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology >>> Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology >>> Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy >>> Rutgers University >>> Piscataway, N.J. 08855 >>> 732-445-4701 >>> >>> www.conformon.net >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Sungchul Ji, Ph.D. >> >> Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology >> Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology >> Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy >> Rutgers University >> Piscataway, N.J. 08855 >> 732-445-4701 >> >> www.conformon.net >> > > > > -- > Sungchul Ji, Ph.D. > > Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology > Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology > Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy > Rutgers University > Piscataway, N.J. 08855 > 732-445-4701 > > www.conformon.net > > > -- Sungchul Ji, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy Rutgers University Piscataway, N.J. 08855 732-445-4701 www.conformon.net
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
