On 11/25/15 9:55 PM, Edwina Taborsky wrote:
The fact that you, astonishingly, deny the triadic aspect of
Peircean semiosis - is something, again, that I cannot deal with.
The fact-of-triadism- is in all of Peirce's work.
Even considering the quotes in my last post, Gary F. was basically
right, Peirce's use of /sign/ almost always denotes a correlate within a
triad, and almost never the whole triad. However, no one thinks Gary
denies the fact that a sign connotes a triad.
--
Matt
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
