Triadic Philosophy as I have evolved it over its lifetime tends to agree in
with what you have said Clark about the triad. With the following exception
which I take to be at least somewhat related to Peirce and perhaps to agree
with something I have seen in Edwina's posts.  The triadic progression is
the progression of a sign which originates in the spontanaity of firstness
and proceeds through the obstacles set up in secondness and arrives at the
expressions and actions made possible by the encounter of 1 and 2.

I understand that the premise of Triadic Philosophy, that Reality is all,
is hardly consistent with Peirce.


Books http://buff.ly/15GfdqU Art: http://buff.ly/1wXAxbl
Gifts: http://buff.ly/1wXADj3

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Clark Goble <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Nov 30, 2015, at 10:50 AM, Sungchul Ji <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>                                         *  f*
>  *g*
>               *Real Rose*  ----------------> *Rose * -----------> *Mental
> Rose*
>               (Firstness)                  (Secondness)
>  (Thirdness)
>      [World of Structures]         [Physical World]          [Mental World]
>                      |
>                    ^
>                      |
>                    |
>                      |____________________________________|
>                                                        *h*
>
>
> Peirce’s ontology doesn’t quite follow that. Firstness is the world of raw
> experience, ideas or possibility, secondness the world of reactions, brute
> force & actuality and thirdness the world of signs, connections and power
> (not necessarily mental unless one is careful what one means by that). So
> depending upon what one means by structure you’d have that in the third
> universe.
>
> Again though one has to be careful with terminology and Peirce’s shifts
> around a bit over time.
>
>
> -----------------------------
> PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
> PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
> [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L
> but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the
> BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm
> .
>
>
>
>
>
>
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to