> On Nov 30, 2015, at 12:03 PM, Clark Goble <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Are you suggesting this as an alternative world view relative to physical >> "laws", e.g., the absence of order? > > No, far from it. Rather the argument would be this is what enables laws to > develop.
Actually let me clarify that somewhat. For Ockham he wants to use it to push a kind of nominalism where the order is just in the mind. I’m just not familiar enough with his arguments to say much there.
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
