Hi Clark, What I meant was a suggestion to investigate their methods and contrast relevant themes. Interrogate their essence.
If you're interested in education and integrating cultures, you ought to know Bruner's work. How can I convince you that it will be good for you? one, two, three...pathos, ethos, logos... Best, J On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:01 PM, CLARK GOBLE <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Feb 1, 2016, at 6:42 PM, Jerry Rhee <[email protected]> wrote: > > How about instead of “…because Peirce”, we try “…because Bruner”? There > is an intense resemblance between the two. > > > Maybe it just says more about my background but I suspect Peirce is far > better known than Bruner. > > In any case we shouldn’t believe just on authority. So appeals to > authority are somewhat problematic to my ears. > > > >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
