Hi Jerry Rhee,
You misunderstand (misinterpret) the sentence by CSP, so your questions
go all wrong.
On should take time to understand properly, before making inferences.
CSP talks about "something like completenes". - No use asking "What
exactly is complete...." The question is absurd.
"something like - " is never exact! - That's the point.
Cheers,
Kirsti
Jerry Rhee kirjoitti 9.4.2016 00:04:
Hi everyone,
In various manuscripts on “Issues of Pragmaticism”, Peirce asserts
“_I have worked out_ the _logic of vagueness_ with _something like
completeness_,* but _need_ not inflict more of it upon you, at
present.”
*The asterisk denotes “Where”? (from CP 5.506, Hartshorne and
Weiss)
After a century of having thought about this problem, what does the
Peirce community have to offer that inflicts more upon it to all who
investigate?
What exactly is "complete" about a logic of vagueness?
Best,
Jerry Rhee
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
