Hi everyone, In various manuscripts on “Issues of Pragmaticism”, Peirce asserts
“*I have worked out* the *logic of vagueness* with *something like completeness*,* but *need* not inflict more of it upon you, at present.” *The asterisk denotes “Where”? (from CP 5.506, Hartshorne and Weiss) After a century of having thought about this problem, what does the Peirce community have to offer that inflicts more upon it to all who investigate? What exactly is "complete" about a logic of vagueness? Best, Jerry Rhee
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
