Hi Kirsti: You wrote:
>> Logic is not linguistics, and shluld not be replaced, not even partly, by >> lingquitics. I awoke in the middle of the night, feeling that I may have mis-read your meaning. Did you mean, linguistics as the study of languages… Or, that logic ITSELF, whatever that may mean, is not language? What is your definition of the term “logic” , perhaps you would be so kind as to give examples? On a different topic, compelling arguments for the perplex number system continue to accumulate. The operations of the real number system (associative, distributive and commutative are now understood. The creation of (biological , in the sense of Ehresmann) memory, originates in the: atoms —> molecules The difference between classical mathematics and organic mathematics lies in the logic of addition of integers. The entailments differ, even though the same consequence, the sum is the same. integers of a partition —> an integer with that partition (“entailment” of parts to generate a whole) This is necessary for critical dynamics of life, e.g., handedness. Atoms with internal parts become the informed source of internal causality of life, and of inner life of mind. … and much more that remains to be written-up. Very warmly, Cheers Jerry
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
