Hi, Jerry,
Where in earth did you take the "moral authority" you (mistakenly)
assume I was refering to?
Pity you did not understand my points.
But if Hilbert is your leading star in the universe of sciences, then it
is understandable that you hold on to his mistakes, as well as his
achievements.
I do not find the concept of identity as easy and simple as eg. Hilbert
took for granted. - But if you remain happy with your ideas on it, I
just wish you luck.
Best, Kirsti
Jerry LR Chandler kirjoitti 15.6.2017 16:37:
Hi Kirsti:
Curious reply!
Other matters have dominated my life in recent months so that I have
not the time to respond to most issues opened here. Nevertheless, you
post deserves comment.
On Jun 15, 2017, at 12:06 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Jerry,
When CSP used "ERGO", that was a case of ENTHYMEME (cf. Aristotle).
The rheme "If - then" remains implied. One is supposed to regocnize
that.
What is the source of the moral authority that I am supposed to be
following.
These three sentences are typical of philosophical conjectures.
Science uses more effective means of communication.
Logic is not linguistics, and shluld not be replaced, not even partly,
by lingquitics. Even though there are a host of philosophers, quite
famous ones even, which have made that mistake.
I am concerned with two clearly separate and distinct notions of logic.
1. The logic of nature that generates the consistency, the
completeness, and the decidability of natural phenomenology.
(following Hilbert.)
2. The logics of human communication by whatever means. These logics
are entangled with one another. How are they entangled? Various
categories of these logics have been used and abused. The records of
human communication about logic appear to originate several millennia
ago and these forms of communication continue to evolve today.
CSP did not make that mistake. Wittgenstein did not make that mistake.
I am pleased to learn that philosophers can be, on occasion,
infallible! :-)
I remain firmly with my stance, that dictionaries may not replace
reading CSP. - Even though they may of of help sometimes. To a limited
degree.
IMHO, every human being is free to use terminology in whatever form of
“units of meaning" that they choose - the forms of the units of
meaning are often related to experience and sometimes even to units of
fact! Of course, one’s usage of terminology allows colleagues to
evaluate the meanings of those units from any perspective the
colleagues may choose.
The central concept behind these comments is the conceptual role of
identity in generating the conceptual dynamics of the perplexity of
individual minds.
Abstractly, as I noted some months ago,
“The union of units unify the unity.”
The graphs (icons) of such perplex unions record the meanings visually.
Cheers
Jerry
Best Kirsti
Jerry LR Chandler kirjoitti 12.6.2017 17:55:
List:
On Jun 12, 2017, at 6:50 AM, [email protected] wrote:
ERGO present just the THEN part.
from Wikipedia (sorry!)
Ergo may refer to:
* A Latin [1] word meaning "therefore" as in Cogito ergo sum.
* A Greek word έργο meaning "work", used as a prefix ergo-, for
example, in ergonomics.
Pragmatically, the syntactical force of “ergo” vastly exceeds the
syntactical force of “then”.
Just my opinion.
Cheers
jerry
Links:
------
[1]
apple-wikipedia-api://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Latin_phrases:_E#ergo
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
[email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to
PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe
PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
