Gary, John, List, When it come to the relative contributions of phenomenology and mathematics to logic, I always find myself returning to the picture I drew from Peirce's Syllabus, on the relations among those two with the normative sciences and metaphysics.
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/05/31/definition-and-determination-4/ • https://inquiryintoinquiry.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/peirce-syllabus.jpg I find this “two-footed, thrice-braced” stance has many advantages over the “dufflepud” attempt to stand logic on phenomenology alone. Regards, Jon -- inquiry into inquiry: https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/ academia: https://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey oeiswiki: https://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
