On 9/12/2018 2:28 PM, Francesco Bellucci wrote:
In any case, I am not ultimately seeking to explicate Peirce's
1904-1906 efforts at classifying Signs; I am trying to develop a
viable framework for understanding Signs and their relations based
on Peirce's /entire /corpus, especially his late writings.
I strongly agree with the goal of developing such a framework.
Peirce's algebraic logic of 1885 has had the strongest influence
on subsequent developments. For a brief survey, see the article
"Peirce the logician" by Putnam: http://jfsowa.com/peirce/putnam.htm
Peirce himself said that his EGs were directly related to all his
other work. Since his 1885 logic can be mapped directly to his EGs
and both versions are precisely defined, that would make his logic
a solid foundation for specifying that framework.
John
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
