BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Thanks for the article - and yes, although it doesn't mention
Peirce, it fits right in with his more exact theory.
A few points:
I'd say that 'resonance' can be equated with 'semiosis', which in my
view, is a constant ongoing reality in our material world. As the
article says ' all things are constantly in motion, vibrating'. I'd
say that all things are in a constant process of semiosis.
Coherence - can be compared with Thirdness or synchronization.
With regard to the article's use of consciousness - they seem to
refer to a process going on within individualism or Secondness,
rather than a mental reflection of the external environment. This
process is mental. So, I'd substitute 'Mind' for 'consciousness' in
these situations. So, yes, all things are individual instances of
Mind/Matter. A bacterium has a sense of its own finiteness and also,
is an expression of Mind and as such, can interact with other
expressions of Mind.
And I'd agree that 'as matter becomes more complex, 'so does mind'.
Edwina
On Wed 05/12/18 11:58 AM , Mike Bergman [email protected] sent:
List,
Speaking of quasi-minds, this reference is very thought provoking,
though the author does not mention Peirce:
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/the-hippies-were-right-its-all-about-vibrations-man/
[1]
Mike
Links:
------
[1]
http://webmail.primus.ca/parse.php?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fblogs.scientificamerican.com%2Fobservations%2Fthe-hippies-were-right-its-all-about-vibrations-man%2F
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
