Jerry, list,
this text by John does not have to be laughed about. What he wrote is completely possible in the sense of functional (evolutional, dynamic) logic, other than spatial (tautologic, static...) logic. Is my opinion.
Best, Helmu
21. Juni 2019 um 19:25 Uhr
"Jerry LR Chandler" <[email protected]>
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
"Jerry LR Chandler" <[email protected]>
On Jun 18, 2019, at 11:50 AM, John F Sowa <[email protected]> wrote:No!!!!!!!!! Peirce never rejected anything unless he found a
new version that subsumed everything useful in the earlier version
*and* the new version demonstrated a fatal flaw in the earlier.
It has been a stressful day; I really needed this laugh! :-)
Cheers
Jerry
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
