Dear Gary / Kristi: On Apr 19, 2006, at 1:05 AM, Peirce Discussion Forum digest wrote:
I find this paragraph fragment to be highly controversial. Why? How does it relate to life? For example, sunlight is the source of energy for plant growth. The chemical process is called photo synthesis. During photosynthesis, photons are absorbed as the source of motion for splitting water into hydrogen ( special form of ) and the metabolic chain creates carbohydrates from carbo (n dioxide) and water (hydrate.) If one considers the food web of ecologies and the role plants play in fueling the food chain (including us), one can ponder the logical consequences of such casual beliefs. In my personal opinion, such narratives are only used by individuals with a very very limited knowledge of life (and the chemical sciences) itself. Cheers Jerry Jerry LR Chandler Research Professor Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study George Mason University --- Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com |
- [peirce-l] Re: peirce-l digest: April 18, 2006 Jerry LR Chandler
- [peirce-l] Re: (offlist) gnusystems
- [peirce-l] Re: Peirce and Prigogine gnusystems
- [peirce-l] Re: Peirce and Prigogine gnusystems
- [peirce-l] Re: Peirce and Prigogine Benjamin Udell
- [peirce-l] Re: Peirce and Prig... gnusystems
- [peirce-l] Re: Peirce and ... Benjamin Udell
- [peirce-l] Re: Peirce ... Benjamin Udell
- [peirce-l] Re: Peirce and Prigogine Victoria N. Alexander
- [peirce-l] Re: Peirce and Prigogine gnusystems
- [peirce-l] Re: Peirce and Prig... Victoria N. Alexander