Gary Richmond wrote:
Jean-Marc, List, this is impossible: if only the sign mediates between the object and the interpretant then the relation is by definition not a genuine triadic relation. It will be degenerate, it is quite clear in the following text: 1.274 A Sign, or Representamen, is a First which stands in such a genuine triadic relation to a Second, called its Object, as to be capable of determining a Third, called its Interpretant, to assume the same triadic relation to its Object in which it stands itself to the same Object. The triadic relation is genuine, that is its three members are bound together by it in a way that does not consist in any complexus of dyadic relations. That is the reason the Interpretant, or Third, cannot stand in a mere dyadic relation to the Object, but must stand in such a relation to it as the Representamen itself does. this is true of signs "in context" with all the determinations you like. PS: this is a detail, but you probably meant "genuine triadic relationship" instead of "genuine trichotomic relationship" ("trichotomic" means something that divides something into 3 parts, while "genuinely triadic" means something that connects three things into one) /JM --- Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber [email protected] |
- [peirce-l] Re: A sign as First or ... Michael J. DeLaurentis
- [peirce-l] Re: A sign as First or ... Gary Richmond
- [peirce-l] Re: A sign as First or ... Jorge Lurac
- [peirce-l] Re: A sign as First or ... Claudio Guerri
- [peirce-l] Re: A sign as First or ... Bernard Morand
- [peirce-l] Re: A sign as First or ... Jim Piat
- [peirce-l] Re: A sign as First or ... Jean-Marc Orliaguet
- [peirce-l] Re: A sign as First or ... Gary Richmond
- [peirce-l] Re: A sign as First or ... Jean-Marc Orliaguet
- [peirce-l] Re: A sign as First or ... Gary Richmond
- [peirce-l] Re: A sign as First or ... Jean-Marc Orliaguet
- [peirce-l] Re: A sign as First or ... Gary Richmond
- [peirce-l] Re: A sign as First or ... Jean-Marc Orliaguet
- [peirce-l] Re: A sign as First or ... Claudio Guerri
- [peirce-l] The logic of disagreement Jim Piat
- [peirce-l] Re: 1st image of triangle of boxes (MS79... Gary Richmond
- [peirce-l] Re: 1st image of triangle of boxes ... Benjamin Udell
- [peirce-l] Re: 1st image of triangle of bo... Drs.W.T.M. Berendsen
- [peirce-l] Re: 1st image of triangle of boxes ... Jean-Marc Orliaguet
