It struck me as Peirceian because, if I'm not mistaken, Peirce denied that there was such a thing as "introspection". He also seemed to affirm the idea that individuals are "less real" than generality... or rather that all individuals are instances of general categories and therefore less real as individuals. I also get the impression that what we call mind or subjective experience is more objective or public than we realize... and this seems to coincide with Dennett's heterophenomenology...the idea that an objective observer might be able to read someone's subjective experience better than the subject him/herself.
On 9/7/06, Steven Ericsson-Zenith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My firm response is that I do not see how it could be.With respect,StevenOn Sep 7, 2006, at 5:04 PM, R Jeffrey Grace wrote:Folks,
Pardon me if this has been brought up before, but does anyone know if Daniel Dennett's Heterophenomenology, which maintains that all subjective states are ultimately objective states, is influence by Peirce or if this is even something similar to Peirce's view?
Thanks for any comments...
--
---
R. Jeffrey Grace
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.rjgrace.com --- Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
---
R. Jeffrey Grace
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rjgrace.com --- Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com
