>I will add that when Henry chooses to be informative, he is one >of the most informative and useful posters on the internet. But >mostly he chooses to spout the obvious or spout nonsense. > >Carrol Yes, but without his intervention we'd be much worse off. It would be better, I suppose, if we had somebody like Marty Hart-Landsberg taking on the topic of China, but he is too busy with North Korea, another state that every high-minded leftist in the west loves to hate. You have to read Henry with a critical eye, which is the case for every other human being. Louis Proyect (The Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org)
- Re: Left Approach to China Trade: A Critical View Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Left Approach to China Trade: A Critica... Stephen E Philion
- RE: RE: Left Approach to China Trade: A CriticalVi... Max B. Sawicky
- Re: RE: RE: Left Approach to China Trade: A Cr... Stephen E Philion
- Re: RE: RE: Left Approach to China Trade: A Cr... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: RE: RE: Left Approach to China Tra... Michael Perelman
- Left Approach to China Trade: A Critical View Louis Proyect
- Re: Left Approach to China Trade: A Critical View Stephen E Philion
- Left Approach to China Trade: A Critical View Louis Proyect
- Re: Left Approach to China Trade: A Critica... Carrol Cox
- Re: Left Approach to China Trade: A Critica... Louis Proyect
- Re: Left Approach to China Trade: A Critica... Stephen E Philion
- Left Approach to China Trade: A Critical Vi... Louis Proyect
- Re: Left Approach to China Trade: A Critica... Doug Henwood
- Re: Left Approach to China Trade: A Critica... Michael Perelman