Ricardo can you document any of this with citations from Marx, or is this more
undergraduate sociology.

Rod

Ricardo Duchesne wrote:

> On 16 May 00, at 17:30, Ted Winslow wrote:
>
> > How about including as categories to be used in understanding these aspects
> > of ourselves the categories of self-determination and of a capacity for full
> > self-determination of thought, desire and action as the "idea" of humanity?
>
> Marx seems a lot closer to the social constructivism that
> dominates much of undergraduate sociology today than Hegel. The
> Kantian/Hegelian concept of self-determination was transformed in
> his hands into a  practical-laboring actitivity. He also thought that
> humans are constructed by a determinate set of social relations,
> and that humans can be re-constructed, which was taken to mean
> by many followers that those who know what is good for everyone
> else have the right to reconstruct the deceived "masses". Che
> called this reconstructed self  the "new man". But if Hegel was
> right, modern humans will never tolerate any such constructions
> except under terms which they have set for themselves (in a
> democratic setting).

--
Rod Hay
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The History of Economic Thought Archive
http://socserv2.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/index.html
Batoche Books
http://Batoche.co-ltd.net/
52 Eby Street South
Kitchener, Ontario
N2G 3L1
Canada

Reply via email to