Re: Re: RE: Re: M once again

[Michael Perelman]

Yes, Justin.  It is better to argue on merits of ideas.  I can tell some very positive 
stories about Roemer as a person told to me by
former students who went to Davis without accepting his ideas.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> And this means what? That his arguments are defective? --jks
>

--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]