Ted Winslow wrote: > Ken Hanly wrote: > > > Reason is not capable of really questioning > > induction since reason is powerless against such a natural instinct. > > How then is Hume able to question induction? This reason/passion/[appetite] metaphysics had its origins in Plato's attack on Athenian democracy -- and as far as I can tell has served reaction ever since. Carrol
- Hume & the Postmodern Gri... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Hume & the Postmo... Brad De Long
- Re: Hume & the Postmo... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: Hume & the Po... Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: Re: Hume & th... Brad DeLong
- Re: Hume & the Postmo... Michael Hoover
- Re: Re: Hume & the Po... Ted Winslow
- Economics and Literature Ted Winslow
- Re: Re: Re: Hume & th... Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Hume &... Ted Winslow
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hume ... Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hume ... Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hume ... Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: H... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: R... Ken Hanly
- pragmatism Jim Devine
- Re: Re: pragmatism Jim Devine
- RE: Hume & the Postm... Lisa & Ian Murray
- RE: Hume & the Postmo... Nicole Seibert
- RE: pomoistas Nicole Seibert
- Re: pomoistas J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
