At 03:31 PM 09/09/2000 -0500, you wrote: >Going down the road of hyperbolic >doubt gets you to the malevolent demon and deep questions about whether we >might not all be brains in vats. I doubt these questions are of great >practical use as preparation for socialist revolution. Isn't that the premise of that movie with Keanu Reeves, THE MATRIX? Can't we dismiss all these questions about induction and epistemology and ontology in a pragmatic way, i.e., say that our doubts and skepticism are really irrelevant if they don't act as a guide to practice? Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~JDevine
- Re: Re: Hume & the Po... Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: Re: Hume & th... Brad DeLong
- Re: Hume & the Postmo... Michael Hoover
- Re: Re: Hume & the Po... Ted Winslow
- Economics and Literature Ted Winslow
- Re: Re: Re: Hume & th... Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Hume &... Ted Winslow
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hume ... Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hume ... Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hume ... Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: R... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: R... Ken Hanly
- pragmatism Jim Devine
- Re: Re: pragmatism Jim Devine
- RE: Hume & the Postm... Lisa & Ian Murray
- RE: Hume & the Postmo... Nicole Seibert
- RE: pomoistas Nicole Seibert
- Re: pomoistas J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Re: pomoistas Doug Henwood
- RE: Re: pomoistas Nicole Seibert
- Re: Re: Re: pomoistas JKSCHW
