I didn't find fault with the content of Lou's note. I asked that we move on
to something new because I didn't see much new coming out of the discussion
and only a handful of people were participating.
Colin Danby wrote:
> Michael I have to take exception. Lou's post was cogent and
> interesting. Speaking as someone who lacked the time to follow the whole
> exchange, it was a useful summing-up of one position, and brought
> forward an important question about agrarian capitalist transition
>
> I have no problem with a moderator enforcing norms of civility, but that
> wasn't the issue here. Letting one person's taste determine how long
> something can be discussed diminishes this list's usefulness, and biases
> it toward trivial chat.
>
> Best, Colin
>
> > I though that this was finished.
> >
> > ------_
> > Michael Perelman
> > Economics Department
> > California State University
> > Chico, CA 95929
> >
> > Tel. 530-898-5321
> > E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
